[Yeti DNS Discuss] 答复: Notes from Yeti 2nd Virtual meeting

Davey Song(宋林健) ljsong at biigroup.cn
Wed Mar 30 08:40:16 UTC 2016


Technical people may not like ICANN, but what we are doing is trying to deliver helpful information to ICANN people. We can definitely send the question to ICANN KSK rollover designing team for this misunderstanding.

 

Davey

 

发件人: discuss [mailto:discuss-bounces at lists.yeti-dns.org] 代表 P Vixie
发送时间: 2016年3月30日 8:11
收件人: David Conrad; Stephane Bortzmeyer
抄送: discuss at lists.yeti-dns.org
主题: Re: [Yeti DNS Discuss] Notes from Yeti 2nd Virtual meeting

 

Damn.

Decorum, please, gentlefolk.

On March 29, 2016 10:43:39 PM GMT+08:00, David Conrad <drc at virtualized.org> wrote:

Well, I certainly wouldn't want to contaminate a technical mailing list with "legalese", so I will bid you all a fond adieu.

Good luck!

Regards,
-drc
 On Mar 29, 2016, at 6:14 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer at nic.fr> wrote:
 
 On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 06:01:12PM +0800,
 Shane Kerr <shane at biigroup.cn> wrote
 a message of 123 lines which said:
 
 That doesn't really seem to be the intent. To me it seems pretty
 clear that every 5 years the RZ KSK was meant to be rolled.
 
 I've read the same thing and I think David Conrad's strange
 interpretation deserves a nomination for the most legalese message on
 a technical
mailing list we've ever seen.
 
 

  _____  


discuss mailing list
discuss at lists.yeti-dns.org
http://lists.yeti-dns.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.yeti-dns.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20160330/30c16512/attachment.html>


More information about the discuss mailing list