[Yeti DNS Discuss] Proposed Next Yeti Experiment: Big ZSK (BGZSK)

["Davey(宋林健)"]

> although, i'd like to automate the three key rolls we're doing now. at the moment, TISF's zsk generation is manual. if we're going to keep to the MZSK model (and i think we ought to), we have to automate before we can move on.
Agree . We can improve it before we move on.

> all we've proved so far is that AXFR and IXFR can be made to work, and even with that, we've learned that MZSK breaks IXFR by default -- that finding should be documented both for network science posterity and as a yeti operational guideline.
There was a ticket working on that weeks ago. But it is slow sadly . it should be prioritized.  I will take charge of it.

---------------------------
Davey Song(宋林健)
BII Lab
ljsong at biigroup.cn



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.yeti-dns.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20160426/04fcfd72/attachment.html>