[Yeti DNS Discuss] [Experiment idea] DNAME from .local to AS112

["Davey(宋林健)"]

I agree with Paul, given that most of experiments on the agenda are not finished yet.  It is not wise to touch the red line, when Yeti is already under controversy. But I think it is encouraged to discuss any idea and dig out some preliminary result (under lab test environment for example )to DNSOP and DNS-OARC. If there is consensus from the community, we can proceed afterwards.

Davey
> 在 2016年4月23日，06:55，Paul Vixie <paul at redbarn.org> 写道：
> 
> i think we must not amend the iana name space unless the following conditions are met:
> 
> 0. the sponsoring organizations of the coordinators (BII, WIDE, TISF) go on record allowing this amendment.
> 
> 1. there's an internet-draft describing the experiment, which has been accepted as a work item in the DNSOP IETF WG.
> 
> 2. every yeti authority operator explicitly signals their agreement (on the record).
> 
> 3. every yeti recursive operator is notified and has a chance to object, and none of them object.
> 
> 4. the experiment is for a limited duration, such as 60 days.
> 
> 5. we've installed dnsdist or similar, in several places, to fork some existing production query stream, to send queries to yeti as well, so that we have some real traffic load, to make our experiments relevant.
> 
> i'm sad to be so concerned, but alternative root dns service is the third rail of internet politics -- first you touch it, then you die.
> 
> vixie
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at lists.yeti-dns.org
> http://lists.yeti-dns.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

---------------------------
Davey Song(宋林健)
BII Lab
ljsong at biigroup.cn



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.yeti-dns.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20160423/f5dcb5f6/attachment.html>