[Yeti DNS Discuss] [rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org: BCP 40, RFC 7720 on DNS Root Name Service Protocol and Deployment Requirements]
marc.blanchet at viagenie.ca
Mon Dec 14 11:26:53 UTC 2015
On 14 Dec 2015, at 5:25, Shane Kerr wrote:
> Presumably this means that they must properly answer queries with the
> DO bit set, not that any specific zone must be signed or not.
right. root zone signing is not the duty of the root servers.
> As far as I know, all Yeti root servers *do* conform to this
> requirement, just like all IANA root servers. :)
> On 2015-12-14 10:56:21+0800 (Monday)
> Davey Song (宋林健) <ljsong at biigroup.cn> wrote:
>> o MUST implement DNSSEC [RFC4035] as an authoritative name service.
>> Not all Yeti root server confirm to this requirement. And IANA root
>> do not conform to this requirement as well. (Root server also server
>> root-servers.net zone)
>> 发件人: discuss [mailto:discuss-bounces at lists.yeti-dns.org] 代表
>> 发送时间: 2015年12月13日 17:53
>> 收件人: discuss at lists.yeti-dns.org
>> 主题: [Yeti DNS Discuss] [rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org: BCP 40, RFC
>> 7720 on DNS
>> Root Name Service Protocol and Deployment Requirements]
>> By the way, an interesting RFC for us. May be testing all Yeti root
>> servers against these rules?
>> discuss mailing list
>> discuss at lists.yeti-dns.org
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at lists.yeti-dns.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the discuss