[Yeti DNS Discuss] 答复: [rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org: BCP 40, RFC 7720 on DNS Root Name ServiceProtocol and Deployment Requirements]
ljsong at biigroup.cn
Mon Dec 14 10:45:18 UTC 2015
yes. I misunderstood.
Sent from my phone
From: "Shane Kerr"<shane at biigroup.cn>
Date: 2015/12/14 18:25:31
To: "Davey Song (宋林健)"<ljsong at biigroup.cn>;
Cc: "discuss"<discuss at lists.yeti-dns.org>;
Subject: Re: [Yeti DNS Discuss] 答复: [rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org: BCP 40, RFC 7720 on DNS Root Name ServiceProtocol and Deployment Requirements]
Presumably this means that they must properly answer queries with the
DO bit set, not that any specific zone must be signed or not.
As far as I know, all Yeti root servers *do* conform to this
requirement, just like all IANA root servers. :)
On 2015-12-14 10:56:21+0800 (Monday)
Davey Song (宋林健) <ljsong at biigroup.cn> wrote:
> o MUST implement DNSSEC [RFC4035] as an authoritative name service.
> Not all Yeti root server confirm to this requirement. And IANA root server
> do not conform to this requirement as well. (Root server also server the
> root-servers.net zone)
> 发件人: discuss [mailto:discuss-bounces at lists.yeti-dns.org] 代表 Stephane
> 发送时间: 2015年12月13日 17:53
> 收件人: discuss at lists.yeti-dns.org
> 主题: [Yeti DNS Discuss] [rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org: BCP 40, RFC 7720 on DNS
> Root Name Service Protocol and Deployment Requirements]
> By the way, an interesting RFC for us. May be testing all Yeti root name
> servers against these rules?
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at lists.yeti-dns.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the discuss