[Yeti DNS Discuss] 答复: [rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org: BCP 40, RFC 7720 on DNS Root Name Service Protocol and Deployment Requirements]

Shane Kerr shane at biigroup.cn
Mon Dec 14 10:25:21 UTC 2015


Davey,

Presumably this means that they must properly answer queries with the
DO bit set, not that any specific zone must be signed or not.

As far as I know, all Yeti root servers *do* conform to this
requirement, just like all IANA root servers. :)  

Cheers,

--
Shane

On 2015-12-14 10:56:21+0800 (Monday)
Davey Song (宋林健) <ljsong at biigroup.cn> wrote:

> 
> o  MUST implement DNSSEC [RFC4035] as an authoritative name service.
> 
> Not all Yeti root server confirm to this requirement. And IANA root server
> do not conform to this requirement as well. (Root server also server the
> root-servers.net zone)
> 
> Davey
> 
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: discuss [mailto:discuss-bounces at lists.yeti-dns.org] 代表 Stephane
> Bortzmeyer
> 发送时间: 2015年12月13日 17:53
> 收件人: discuss at lists.yeti-dns.org
> 主题: [Yeti DNS Discuss] [rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org: BCP 40, RFC 7720 on DNS
> Root Name Service Protocol and Deployment Requirements]
> 
> By the way, an interesting RFC for us. May be testing all Yeti root name
> servers against these rules?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at lists.yeti-dns.org
> http://lists.yeti-dns.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss






More information about the discuss mailing list